Acim, Subhan Abdullah (2023) Systematic, substantive and functional comparison between the holy qur’an and pancasila. HTS Theological Studies, 79 (2). pp. 1-8. ISSN P-ISSN 0259-9422 E-ISSN 2072-8050

	Text (Artikel Jurnal) Systematic, substantive and functional.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (948kB)
	Text (Cek Plagiasi) Systematic, substantive and functional (1).pdf - Supplemental Material Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (2MB)
	Text (Korespondensi) Bukti Korespondensi_ Abdullah A Acim.pdf - Supplemental Material Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (1MB)

Abstract

ENGLISH The Qur’an and Pancasila are two sources of Indonesian values that are existentially different from each other. Despite the difference, they both factually could walk in harmony, and it is important to seek the similarities and differences between them. This article presents the systematic, substantive, and functional reasons for how they could work altogether by looking at the similarities and differences in anatomy, taxonomy, substance, and function of each component of the Qur’an and Pancasila. Utilizing a naturalistic approach with content analysis genre, the writers collected the data from various documents, including; manuscripts of the Qur’an, Pancasila, speeches of the founding fathers of Indonesia, and the previous research results using document recording sheets. The collected data were analyzed through content analysis techniques and displayed in pictures and tables. The results showed: (1) the anatomy of the Qur’an consists of four components, namely: divinity, law, history, and story, while the anatomy of Pancasila only consists of a law component; (2) the taxonomy of the Qur'an is intersected with one another, while the taxonomy of Pancasila is stratified. The values in all components are generally the same, and the divine value is the primary value. The taxonomy of values in Pancasila is degraded and systemic, with the divine value as the main value / encompassing other values (prima causa); (3) the Qur’an’s substance covers all life dimensions while the dimensions of Pancasila are limited to law. One of the essential points in this section is that Pancasila makes the Qur’an a source of value; (4) the Qur’an is partially or holistically functional while Pancasila is holistically functional. Therefore, componential and substantial, the Qur’an and Pancasila have similarities, while structurally and functionally, they are different.Contribution: The results of this study described a systematic sequence, substantive relationships and functional pattern between the Qur’an and Pancasila. These research findings are expected to reduce misunderstandings among the Indonesian people about the Qur’an and Pancasila. Keywords: The Qur’an; Pancasila; systematic sequence; substantive relationship; functional pattern

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	the qur’an; pancasila; systematic sequence; substantive relationship; functional pattern.
Subjects:	16 STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY > 1606 Political Science > 160602 Citizenship 22 PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES > 2204 Religion and Religious Studies > 220403 Islamic Studies > 22040301 Al-Quran, Tafsir and related science
Divisions:	Fakultas Dakwah dan Ilmu Komunikasi > Jurusan Manajemen Dakwah
Depositing User:	mrs Nuraeni S.IPi
Date Deposited:	16 Feb 2023 01:53
Last Modified:	16 Feb 2023 02:16
URI:	http://repository.uinmataram.ac.id/id/eprint/2311

Actions (login required)

View Item